Monday, 14 January 2013

"Using network and graph theory to influence drug design" (by J.E.A. Wallace)


Chemoinformatics (also known as ‘cheminformatics’) applies computational and information science techniques to a range of chemical problems.  These techniques are used, for example, to model compounds and to predict their properties.  Chemoinformatics has made it possible to simulate expensive operations such as high-throughput screening (the rapid testing of numerous compounds for desirable qualities).  A good starting point for those new to the field is the book ‘An Introduction to Chemoinformatics’ by Leach and Gillet.

My project is specifically concerned with the idea of de novo design (Latin for ‘from new’).  De novo design builds novel molecules in virtual space and evaluates them against some measure of functionality, such as similarity to a compound known to work well, or the complementarity between the shape of the molecule and the receptor it is to fill. The aim is to streamline the drug discovery process.  By referring to these virtual compounds, it may be possible to reduce the number of synthesis operations necessary. However, the sheer number of potential molecules that can be made renders it impossible to explore all of chemical space for solutions, even with modern levels of computing power. As a result, various predictive sampling processes (such as the Monte Carlo method) have been adapted for use in this field. These can give good results, but their simplistic approach to constructing molecules can lead to products being generated that are impossible to fabricate in real world situations, limiting the overall usefulness of the methods.

In order to work around such problems, methods have been developed within the chemoinformatics group that use genuine reaction data from literature to create generic rules (the reaction vectors).  These rules can be applied to a given starting material to generate new molecules. This provides a compromise between finding novel molecules and retaining a synthetic awareness, as each transformation is based on a literature precedent. However, this method has its own limitations.  Some structures for example, can be built up using multistep reaction sequences. In many cases, the intermediate steps in such sequences do not resemble either the end product or the starting material in terms of similarity to the target.  Consequently, many potentially useful molecules are never completed because steps en route to the end product score poorly.

One solution to this problem is to create a new rule format that represents all the reaction steps in one operation. This requires some initial identification of those sequences, which is where my project comes in. If we regard a chemical reaction as a transformation of one molecule into another, it becomes possible to connect these transformations together into a network.  Every path through the network will represent a multistep synthetic route for which each step has a known example in the literature.  Reaction properties such as ease of synthesis, cost of materials, yield of product etc. can then be added to the network to bias the selection of routes in accordance with a particular set of criteria.

Thursday, 22 November 2012

Libraries and Information Society research group meeting

This is another post about a recent meeting of the Libraries and Information Society research group (last Wednesday). Angharad Roberts talked about her visit to the University of Pittsburgh iSchool, USA (which she also blogged about in the last post here). She explained some of the differences in structure and approach of the PhD programmes in Pittsburgh and at Sheffield (for example, there is a much larger taught element in the Pittsburgh programme) and we discussed a few of the pros and cons of each. As part of her visit Angharad had participated in a session about academic writing. One of the texts for this was:
Sword, H. (2012). Stylish academic writing. Harvard University Press.
This led on to an interesting discussion about our own experience of academic writing and in particular our use of the first person ("I"): when we felt we could use it and what the alternatives were. We also talked a little about journal editor's expectations and our experiences in submitting articles.
The next meeting of the whole group (staff and research students) is on 12th December at 3.30pm.

Thursday, 8 November 2012

Using blogs for research - a discussion in Pittsburgh

On Monday, I had the opportunity to facilitate a discussion at the University of Pittsburgh iSchool about using blogs for research. This is a topic I have spoken about before at one of our monthly informal researcher discussion sessions in Sheffield and I hope this is a subject we can return to in another meeting later this year. In Pittsburgh, I began the session with a brief presentation, highlighting two UK reports which I think are relevant to this topic: Research Information Network (2011) Social Media: A Guide for Researchers and JISC (2012) Researchers of Tomorrow: The Research Behaviour of Generation Y Doctoral Students. I followed this by discussing three blogs created and maintained by members of the University of Sheffield iSchool:
  • This blog - Sheffield iSchool researchers - which I think is a good example of a group blog, providing an opportunity for a number of people to author posts relating to their research or about methodological issues. I also think this is a good example of how a virtual community, based around the blog, can grow and reinforce a real world community, based around the monthly informal researchers' discussion sessions.
  • Sheila Webber's Information Literacy Weblog - a really good example of an expert blog, which is a very valuable current awareness source for both academics and practitioners working in the information literacy field. Relatively short posts and lots of photos make the blog very accessible, whilst the integration of other social media tools, such as a Twitter feed and a Flickr stream, potentially broadens the blog's audience.
  • My research blog, which gives a personal perspective on my experiences as a PhD student and my research activities - especially about the events I've attended.
I summarised some of my own reflections about the benefits, limitations and challenges of blogging and we then moved into a really interesting and lively group discussion about blogging for research. Now I'd like to ask you a few questions, as a reader of this blog, whether you're in Sheffield, Pittsburgh or anywhere else - perhaps we can continue the discussion here:
  • If you're a new visitor to this blog, what do you think about it?
  • If you've been viewing or contributing this blog for a while, what has kept you coming back?
  • Have you ever referred anyone to posts on this blog? If so, which ones?
  • What could we do to improve our blog?
  • What are your views about blogging about research in general? Have you used a blog, or would you like to share a good example of a blog which has been useful for your research?
Finally, I'd like to offer a very warm thank you to everyone at the University of Pittsburgh iSchool who made me feel so welcome earlier this week and to everyone who took part in our discussion.

Friday, 2 November 2012

What would Goffman think about furries? Persona adoption and identity masking in blogs and Second Life (by Liam Bullingham)



Concerning online identity, this research investigated persona adoption in blogs and Second Life (SL), aiming to discover how, why, and to what extent this occurs. The theories of early scholars Erving Goffman and Marcel Mauss were considered and applied to interaction in these emerging online environments.

The research sample included four bloggers, four SL users and two users of both media, and participants were interviewed using a semi-structured format. Data was then analysed and categorised using grounded theory.  The literature review yielded some fascinating examples of persona adoption and masking identity, such as Baker's 'blended identity' and Nakamura's 'identity tourism'; and it considered what online identity means within the wider concept of 'the self'. Goffman's claim that we wear a number of different masks in public was applied to SL & blogging, and users were seen to employ anonymity or psudonymity in order minimise the impressions they inadvertently 'give off', in Goffmanian terms. The practice of 'gender swapping' in online interaction and the concept of the avatar were also explored.
Interview data was discussed and categorised as follows:

·         Expressions given,
·         'Fitting in' - a key motivation for persona adoption,
·         Recreating the offline self online,
·         Dividing the self,
·         Anonymity,
·         Minor persona adoption through embellishment,
·         Information evaluation techniques are not always needed.

Following this, data was interwoven with scholarly research to test research findings. 'Recreating the offline self online', whereby participants were keen to re-create
their offline self online was an additional finding, in that it was not informed by the literature.

In comparing blogging and SL, it was found that there is significantly more pressure to conform in SL, meaning more persona adoption occurs through the use of the avatar. Persona adoption in blogging however, occurs in different ways, and perhaps
because there is less social pressure, there is also less persona adoption.

When concluding, I noted that the major limitation of the research was the small research sample, as identifying participants was difficult. However, research questions were well informed in that participants exhibited behaviours such as anonymity or 'embellishing the self' and explained their reasons for doing this.

Wednesday, 17 October 2012

Libraries and Information Society (LIS) Research Group meeting

The LIS Research Group had a meeting yesterday, with research students and staff in attendance. Elizabeth Chapman, Halima Egberongbe, Joseph Essel, Stephen Pinfield, Angharad Roberts, Barbara Sen, Kondwani Wella and I each talked briefly about the aims and methods of our current research. Some interesting questions arose e.g. to do with sample selection and the meaning of "pragmatic" in a research context. The next meeting of staff and students on November 14 will also focus on exchange of information on current research, and the following one, on 12 December takes as its theme "How do you select a theoretical framework and research approach?"

Friday, 12 October 2012

Designing an e-procurement decision support system (by Mohamed Adil)

My proposed research focuses on the design of decision support systems (DSS) using Multi-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA).  The study uses published mathematical models to study and design a suitable model for a public sector e-procurement DSS. The research will also develop a prototype, thereby providing a new tool for practitioners and researchers in the area of MCDA.

The research focuses on the public sector in the Maldives: in particular, the education sector.

Public sector procurement has a rigid structure enforced by law and regulations. The features and characteristics of public sector procurement are based on major public sector principles such as non-discrimination, equality, transparency and proportionality. This results in an organised step-by-step procedure for public sector procurement. However, this research focuses only on decisions that are based on the performances of the suppliers against a preset list of criteria.  These criteria allow public sector institutions to state differentiated priorities when they announce for bids or tenders. This situation creates a context in which MCDA techniques can be applied to the evaluation. 

There are multiple MCDA methods. However, the applicability of these methods to the problem context is not known due to the multiple constrains and expectations of the public sector. This research will study the applicability of a set of published MCDA methods to the problem context. The MCDA methods used in this research involve linear weighting methods, single synthesising criterion (or utility theory), outranking methods, fuzzy methods and mixed methods.

The process steps of the methodology involve an awareness of the problem at first, followed by suggestion and development of an artefact, and finally evaluation and conclusion of it.  The methodology used here follows a set of specific guidelines provided by information systems (IS) research scholars for such IS research projects.

To support the process steps of the research project, a literature review was done, field research was carried out, and some selected documented data on procurement evaluations were collected. For the field research, focus groups were conducted to enhance awareness of the problem, to help to make more specific suggestions, and to support the development of the artefact.

The literature review of literature concerning MCDA models literature helped made it possible to compare the public sector requirements and constraints against the characteristics of MCDA methods. This approach helped filtering and suggesting alternative methods to that might be appliedy.

The collected data sets are to be used to apply the artefact to evaluations, The results of this exercise are to be statistically and mathematically evaluated in order to determine the usefulness of the artefact.

Sunday, 9 September 2012

Evaluation (again) - some thoughts around school exams as indicators of success

Following our last researchers' discussion, the pub conversation again turned to evaluation.  We talked about the problems caused by applying simple measures to public bodies, and I rashly suggested a solution - that  a second simple measure should be introduced, that is 'orthogonal' to the first.

For the purposes of analysis, I had recently been revisiting an interview with a school teacher.  She (like many of my interviewees) was reflecting sadly on the extent to which educational values are skewed by the need to "teach to the exam". In other words, students are taught to anticipate exam questions and to frame their efforts with a view to producing a high scoring answer.  Any school activity not related to exams is marginalized.

Other examples of evaluation-induced skewing were discussed (including the forthcoming Research Excellence Framework) and there was some head-shaking about the damage such an exercise will do to Higher Education.

The problem is common where simple measures are applied to complex systems.  Simple measures are often simply met; and if meeting the measure is all that counts then other important criteria get neglected.  I heard a macabre example of such skewness recently (27 August) on BBC Radio 4.   Amanda Vickery, in a programme about sailors,  interviewed  Dr David Turner of Swansea University about disability in the British navy in the 18th Century. He observed that, back then, there were concerns "...that surgeons might be a little too willing to amputate limbs in cases where this wasn't altogether necessary. There are some complaints that naval and military surgeons cut off limbs because they are paid by the number of limbs that they amputated..." (12min 15sec).

Orthogonality
Any second measure should be as different as possible from the first, but should be given equal importance.  In the case of schools for example, exam success is an obvious criterion for assessment; but a second criterion could be based on the response of school leavers to a survey designed to assess the school's success in promoting involvement and inclusion.  The survey could include statements such as the following:
  • If my school held a reunion next year, I would want to come back for it. 
  • My school allowed me to take part in at least one sport that I enjoyed.
  • If something bad happened to me, there were people I could talk to at school.
  • My teachers were interested in what I had to say.
  • While I was at school, I took part in performances (eg, concerts or plays).
  • I never felt threatened by the behaviour of other students.
[1=Strongly agree / 6=Strongly disagree].

School funding and reputation are currently strongly linked to exam performance.  If they were as strongly linked to positive responses to statements such as those above, decisions about a school's priorities would be based on a far more nuanced view of success.